Showing posts with label religious history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label religious history. Show all posts

The 1950s and the Contactee Phase of Modern UFOlogy

First, updates and news. Follow my writing at this blog, my other blog - www.peterhuston.blogspot.com and the Hamchuck Writers' Collective Website, www.hamchuckwc.com    

And you can also try my Goodreads page at https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/339311.Peter_Huston Or my Amazon.com page at https://www.amazon.com/Peter-Huston/e/B000APT3YY?ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1&qid=1646105078&sr=8-1


I have pieces scheduled to appear, most likely within the next year in the following edited volumes. 

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/brickcommajason/there-i-waswhen-nothing-happened?fbclid=IwAR2OgupQaj1Jzn-fBATT5hgS-DUFQadggCcu_BIi_LHZ57JCaatjk0Ne-38

There I was and . . . Nothing Happened, edited by Jason Brick. 

Buy this, or get it from the many public libraries that have expressed interest and made plans to acquire a copy (has yours? If not, why not?), and you can treat yourself to the story of how one night I almost got my face slashed to ribbons in a dive bar in Shanghai. Due out within the next year. Please enjoy the read. 

Second piece is scheduled to appear here: 

 
The Reliability of UFO Witness Testimony, edited by  VICENTE-JUAN BALLESTER OLMOS

For this one, I also drew on past events, and wrote about my experiences meeting Betty Hill, Richard Price, and many other UFO Abductees, of the late 1990s / early 21st century. Read it, and you can learn why I remain skeptical of their stories.

Having done extensive research into UFO claims, I decided it was time to turn my knowledge and views into a book and am working on it now. What follows is one excerpt. 


The Contactee Phase of Modern UFOlogy

 


The so-called “Contactee Phase” of UFOlogy began in the mid 1950s, less than ten years after Kenneth Arnold’s sighting. It would only make sense that if people were seeing piloted objects of unknown origin zipping around in the skey, that sooner or later someone would claim to have met their pilots. And so, it happened.

Although during this period, there were a few people who claimed such contact, George Adamski was the first and most famous. Although Adamski made his name spreading the philosophical teachings of the benevolent saucer beings who had allegedly spoken to him, prior to his claims of contact with saucer beings, Adamski had been spreading the messages of other enlightened beings and had created his own order, the Brotherhood of Tibet. In addition to this,  he ran a hamburger stand near the famous Hale Telescope and lectured on Eastern philosophy. 

The teachings of this organization, like those of Adamski’s later flying saucer related organization, were heavily influenced by Theosophy and similar organizations. Theosophy was an American religious or philosophical organization based on the teachings and ideas that Russian immigrant Helena Petrovna Blavatsky had allegedly received from Ascended Masters reported to be living in exotic places such as Tibet or Egypt. These teachings consisted of several Asian religious or mystical concepts that at that time were largely unknown or unfamiliar to Americans (such as “karma” and”reincarnation”), mixed in with reworked versions of more familiar Western fringe concepts such as the stories of Atlantis, Mu, and Lemuria, mixed in with the ideas of the spiritualists of those days such as astral projection and telepathic communication.  Although little known today, Theosophy had a lasting impact and influence on the Western intellectual landscape and many of today’s popular fringe, esoteric, “New Age,” and other pop-spiritual beliefs and ideas.  

While Adamski had limited formal schooling, he lectured regularly on such subjects using the title “Professor.” He also took advantage of prohibition and his special standing as a religious order to manufacture wine, something very much in demand when prohibition made the sale and purchase of alcohol against the law, against the law, of course, except for special religious orders.

Adamski seems to have realized that by using the public interest in flying saucers to add to his mix and attributing the messages he spread to enlightened beings from Venus, Mars, and the Moon he could better capture the public imagination, spread these messages and teachings, and get attention and profit for his organization. 

Although he and a ghost writer had together written a novel describing contact with aliens and a voyage through the solar system on a flying saucer in 1949, it was in 1950 that he gave his first lecture on “flying saucers” in which he shared the story of how the US Naval Laboratory had asked him for assistance with using the observatory to take pictures of flying saucers. Alas, the Navy denied it although the fact was that two members of their laboratory personnel had, indeed, visited his hamburger stand and bought lunch one day and they had chatted with him while doing so.

According to Adamski’s reports, it was November 20, 1952, when he made his own personal first contact with a saucer being named Orthon who came from Venus and shared important messages about how we should all be nice to each other. Ultimately, he wrote two more books on his contact with the saucer beings and lectured and travelled widely speaking on the subject. Although most flying saucer enthusiasts of the time were skeptical of the truth of Adamski’s cl;aims, nevertheless he became a regular speaker and panelist at UFO and flying saucer related gatherings for the next few decades.

In  his memoir, “Shockingly Close to the Truth –Confessions of a Grave-Robbing Ufologist,” James Moseley describes Adamski as “charming,” clearly enjoyed interacting with him, but points out several discrepancies between Adamski’s claims about the events described and the people who witnessed them. Similarly, a French biographer of Adamski, Marc Hallet, while reportedly beginning his biography of Adamski as a believer, came to a very different conclusion by the time he finished. His conclusions were summarized in the very bluntly titled, nine page document, “Why I can say Adamski is a liar.” For reasons such as those offered by these two men, as well as what astronomers have since learned about conditions on Venus, Mars, and the Moon that make it difficult to believe that they are or ever were home to the societies and peoples that Adamski described, it’s safe to say very few historians consider George Adamski’s claim of contact with enlighted beings as having taken place and being historically important events.

Nevertheless, soon there were others claiming similar experiences, telling similar stories, spreading similar teachings, and writing similar books. These included Truman Bethurum, Daniel Fry, Orfeo Angelucci, and Howard Menger.  

To put this in historical context, although all the prominent contactees began to share their stories in the 1950s, Adamski, the first, begin in 1953, they all claimed to have been interacting with the enlightened space beings for several years. Nevertheless, most historians see them as a mid-1950s cultural development.

Gordon J. Melton, scholar of new religious movements, has made a few generalizations about these contactees and their stories. In order, he offered the following. As can be seen, these points make it clear how in many ways the contactees and their stories were doing and offering a distinctly different message, experience, and approach to the issue of alleged extraterrestrial visitation than the later UFO abduction proponents.

First, and this is unlike later beliefs held in ufological circles about on-going extraterrestrial visitation to our planet, the visitors came from within our solar system. Originally, they were beings from Mars, Venus, and the Moon. Later they came from a little further, places like Jupiter and Saturn. In 1953, one contactee, Truman Bethurum began telling stories of being visited and taken on flying saucer trips by the inhabitants of the mysterious Planet Clarion, but as he also reported that this unknown world was directly opposite the Earth on the other side of the sun (and thus impossible for us to see), it was still located in the solar system. Although flying saucers from other worlds were visiting, they were not presented or said to be interstellar craft.

Second, according to Melton, “the flying saucer remains the only new element in the contactee story.” The other elements of the Contactees’ stories, argues Melton, had all been seen before in other stories, in other tales which reported the teachings of enlightened beings and otherworldly teachers. The difference was that they met their enlightened, mystical teachers through astral travel or other means, not by travel in flying saucer.        

In the reports of the Contactees, interactions with the alien saucer pilots were surprisingly easy. Communication was either done in English or through non-verbal telepathy. (As a teacher of English as a Second or Other Language, I confess that I have never understood how this could possibly happen as so much of human thought is, indeed, based in language.)

Bottom line is, however, that very little in these reports was terribly groundbreaking or eye opening.

Third, what the Contactees did share tended to be ethical and religious teachings. Very little time and focus was spent on describing the anthropological details of the alien societies or the intricacies of their technologies. In other words, the Aliens and the Contactees who had met them were much more interested in spreading messages that warned the people of Earth about the dangers of atomic weapons testing or pollution and advocating for world peace than they were interested in telling us about themselves or sharing their advanced technologies or teaching us how to make our own flying saucers.  

Fourth, the Contactees operated in a religious context. Many came from a religious or occult background or a background where the two overlapped such as Theosophy. As Peebles wrote in his excellent history,  Many founded churches or organizations devoted to spreading religious or philosophical teachings. (It needs to be mentioned, that under US law, there are many advantages to structuring an entity as a church, a fact that no doubt affected the way many contactees structured their organizations.) 

In summary, the picture presented by the contactees was that highly advanced space brothers lived in the other worlds of our solar system, and, if one was lucky enough, they would take you on a trip around the solar system on one of their flying saucers. Since their societies were free of war and disease, they had a lot to teach us and one thing in particular that they hope we would do was stop atomic testing. They offered us a message of peace and brotherhood and since they either spoke good English or else communicated through telepathy, the message was not just simple but also easy to understand. 

The whole thing was in some ways delightful. Optimistic.

Although the world was in trouble and humanity imperiled, fear                 not. There were beings out there who knew more about this than we did, and they were here to offer guidance. All we had to do was listen and believe and all would be well.

Unlike the later grays and other extraterrestrials of later decades, rather than presenting a mystery and leaving us with disturbing questions as to who were the aliens and what were they hoping to ultimately accomplish, the contactees of this era claimed to have answers for us instead.  And they were more than willing to share the answers they had obtained through lectures, radio appearances, and books.

Iroquois housing and architectural shift at the time of the American Revolution (plus some gaming stuff)

If you have looked at this blog much, you will know that I enjoy miniature wargaming, model building, and studying history, among other things. Currently I am looking into local history from the American Revolutionary War era and reading "The Iroquois in the American Revolution," a classic work by Barbara Graymont (1972, Syracuse University Press.) Please note the link to purchase this book and support the blog below.

Which got me to thinking, what sort of houses did the Iroquois live in at this time and what sort of fortifications did they have?

Traditionally, the Iroquois lived in multi-family longhouses in walled villages. Many illustrations of them exist.  I've included several below, but before you look at them, let's think a bit. Did the Iroquois live in the longhouses at the time of the American Revolution?



For the record, Iroquois still live today and today they do not live in longhouses. Even at the most traditional Mohawk and/ or Iroquois settlements today, you are not going to find people living in longhouses. (In fact, my father once helped with a construction project at Ganienkeh, a radical, Mohawk / Iroquois separatist community with both a Mohawk language school and a stubborn insistence that they are part of the sovereign Mohawk nation, not subject to US or Canadian law. He helped build some houses. They were, for the record, of modern design and not longhouses.)

So when did the architectural shift take place? Like so much in Iroquois history and society, the shift, it seems took place in the mid-eighteenth century.But first let's look a bit at the traditional housing and styles of community lay out.



According to Graymont, pages 9-10, while some of the longhouses were single family, most were multi-family, The number of longhouses in a community varied widely, depending, as one would expect on the size of the community. "Small hamlets" might have just four to five longhouses, while the largest Iroquois communities could have over one hundred longhouses, as well as walls and structures for smoking food and other necessities of community life. The smallest longhouses were  "20 feet long, 16 feet wide, and 15 feet high" (about 6m. by 5m. by 5m) according to Graymont, while the average was "60 feet long, 18 feet wide, and 18 feet high" (about 18m. by 5.5m by 5.5m) again according to Graymont. The largest on record, she says, was 334 feet long by 23 feet wide. (about 102m. long by 7m wide). She gives no height but as longhouses were curved in shape, I think it's safe to estimate it was between 18 and 23 feet high ( 5.5m to 7m. approximately).  She also gives detailed descriptions of the construction and other architectural details of these longhouses. As these are easily found through a websearch, I see no need to share them here. 



Again according to Graymont, these traditional settlements were often fortified. As this is a detail of much interest to wargamers, it seems worth quoting the entire paragraph from the book in full:

"The Iroquois lived in stockaded villages located usually in easily defensible high places near a supply of water. The log palisades were from fifteen to twenty feet in height, in single, double, triple, or quadruple lines, interlaced, and then reinforced with heavy bark. A deep ditch might surround the palisades with the dirt being thrown up to form an embankment next to the palisade. A bark battlement might also run along the top and, in time of war, be supplied with piles of stone to hurl down upon the enemy and jars of water to extinguish fires started by burning arrows. After 1600, when the power of the Iroquois Confederacy was at its height, and particularly after 1700, with the end of the Iroquois wars, fewer of the inner villages of the Five Nations were heavily palisaded. A more modest type enclosure was all that was needed to keep the forest animals from scavenging in the village," (Graymont, pp. 9-10)


However, we are talking about the time of the American Revolution (or as they say in the UK, "the American War of Independence" ), a period when Iroquois culture and politics was in great flux, a time when, as one science fiction series says in the prologue, "everything changed."

So did the Iroquois live in such houses at this time? It seems some did but an increasing numbers of others were adopting White housing styles.  Again, it seems worthwhile to include Graymont's entire paragraph on this:

"Toward the end of the eighteenth century, the Iroquois began to build the same type of log houses used by the white frontier settlers. An occasional well-to-do Indian would even build a frame house in imitation of his more affluent white neighbors. Bark houses survived to some extent well into the middle of the nineteenth century but gradually gave way to the sturdier dwellings copied from the whites." (Graymont, p. 10)


This house is a modern reconstruction of a house on the Saratoga Battlefield, a National Historic Park. It is shared merely to show a typical house of the time and place discussed. You may see other photos at https://benedictarnold.smugmug.com/Battles-of-Saratoga/John-Neilson-House/ I did not wish to infringe upon the copyright of those photos but there is one there that includes people and clearly shows the small size of the house, not uncommon in those days.

===
Graymont also includes an interesting story about an Oneida church built in the 1770s. While the missionary who promoted the  church in the first place, Samuel Kirkland, followed a school of theology known as "the New Light Principle" which held that churches need not have steeples and Baptism with water was not essential for salvation (Note: I hope to research this more. It sounds like the teachings of the Religious Society of Friends / "Quakers" may have had an influence here.) his local parishners, Oneida felt otherwise and in 1774 when the church was two years old decided, over his objections that it was unnecessary, that their church should have a steeple insisting, in Graymont's words, that "if white people could have steeples over their churches, so could they. Indian religion was worth no less than the white man's religion." (Graymont, p. 46)

While it was not this church, you may see photos of another Iroquois built church (Mohawk-built) from this era here: https://indiancastle.church/


As for Iroquois fortifications of the era, they are mentioned in several places in this work and in the histories of that time. Lacking knowledge to the contrary (at least at this time of writing), I would assume they would have been a mix of the fortifications described above along with the White style of frontier fortifications of the time.




Stillwater, New York Blockhouse Museum ( https://www.albany.org/listing/stillwater-blockhouse-museum/1006/ )




The Old Stone Fort from Schoharie New York ( see https://theoldstonefort.org/our-museums/old-stone-fort/  )

WARGAMING 


I am painting a large quantity of northeastern woodland Indians from that era, a large bag of 25mm Old Glory French and Indian War figures that were donated to me by a friend who never got around to paint them. ( Product ID: FIW-01 Natives Advancing with muskets ) Although in my mind they are supposedly Iroquois, I do not guarantee the details are correct, some of the hairstyles in particular look quite "iffy" but they are good enough for wargaming particularly as I did get them for free.


They will supplement the old RAFM Flint and Feather figures that I bought and painted years, really decades, ago. ( RAFM Flint and Feather ) I'll try to post pictures later. I also hope to do some supplements with figures from other ranges as well. Perry Brothers and Warlord Games both have some nice looking figures for the period but I am sure they are not alone. Bob Murch and Crucible Crush have an exciting looking line called "Flint and Feather" of pre-European and time of European contact Iroquois and Algonquins that while not quite right for this period seems nevertheless definitely worth mentioning.


ADDITIONAL LINKS

A New York State Museum exhibit and presentation on Iroquois longhouses. 
http://exhibitions.nysm.nysed.gov/iroquoisvillage/

Another website with lovely pictures of longhouses and Iroquois architecture.
https://www.hhhistory.com/2016/04/the-iroquois-longhouse.html


Should you wish to purchase one, this company makes resin models of Iroquois longhouses for wargaming. Although I've linked to a particularly nice looking one, there are others on their site, as well as a blockhouse and stockade walls, under the "American Frontier" section. Please note I have not done business with this company or seen their products in person.
https://achesoncreations.com/index.php?option=com_virtuemart&view=productdetails&virtuemart_product_id=82&virtuemart_category_id=16

A fun website that gives instructions on how to build your own model longhouses for wargaming if you do not wish or are not able to spend money on resin cast models.
https://onelover-ray.blogspot.com/2011/04/how-to-build-no1-fiw-indian-longhouses.html


I stumbled across this while researching this blog, a biography of Samuel Kirkland, the missionary to the Iroquois mentioned above. I have not read it yet but it seemed worth noting and sharing. 
https://archive.org/details/samuelkirklandsm00lenn 



   

Mary Dyer, Quaker Martyr and Troublemaker Supreme


On the front lawn of the capital building of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts near the famed Boston Commons sits a statue of a woman. Who was this woman and why did the Massachusetts government choose to honor her in this way? Why, because an earlier version of the Massachusets government had hung her for being a dangerous and disruptive person. And when you hang someone, and feel bad, the only way to make it up is to create a statue of them a couple centuries later.This woman's name was Mary Dyer and she lived and was hung in the 17th Century.




Mary Dyer is widely credited as the only woman hung for heresy in Massachusetts. She is also, so they say, an ancestor of mine. (see https://history-for-fun-profit-and-insight.blogspot.com/2018/06/genetics-race-geneology-famous.html for some of my thoughts on these things please.)

And personally, despite a lot of self-righteous posturing and simplistic explanations of what occured, there actually were some complex issues involved. (Honestly, I lived in the Boston area for three years. I found it a rather smug and self righteous place and the fact that they responded to hanging a woman, essentially because the government considered itself the one true way and she disruptively insisted they weren't, by building a statue to her 150 years or so later, acting as if they were above all things and had now found the one true way again by saying they were above such things, just strikes me as an equally smug and dangerously self-righteous thing to.  My opinion is if the government and ruling class of Boston hung someone once, sooner or later they will be tempted to do it again, and for the same reason --that person is very, very bad because he criticized the moral authority of the ruling class of Massachusetts.)

So who was Mary Dyer and what did she do that was so awful and disruptive anyway? What motivated people to consider her to be someone best killed? There's a lot of writing on it

Well, was it because she was a Quaker? And if so, what was it about Quakers that excited the government of Massachusetts so much.

First, the government of Massachusetts at the time was controlled by Puritans. Although both the Puritans and the Quakers were Christian sects that had originated in England, they were very different in their approaches to society, authority, and approach to God. 

The Puritans were a rigid sect, with a hierarchical structure, in which the authorities, by virtue of their position and education in such matters, interpreted the Bible and the will of God and set these teachings out for their members, expecting them to be obeyed and followed.  

The Quakers, by contrast, were (and still often are) an anarchistic group that believed that each of their members could sense the will of God guiding them from within. Thus a Quaker (or more properly, as they later became known, a member of the Religious Society of Friends) not only had no need of an authority figure when they wished religious guidance, and felt quite comfortable ignoring the authorities in even the most important of things, with their belief that God could guide them from within, they were prone to completely disregard and even contradict the Puritan authorities. They would even go so far as to criticize them publicly. And they would encourage others to do so as well. 

And many people of the time considered Quakers to be a dangerous, insane, fringe element, of absolutely no use to the good people of mainstream society. During this time, Quakers were known to do such things as take off all their clothes, enter a Puritan church in mid-service while still completely undressed, and then, without missing a beat, having become the focus of attention instead of the designated preacher, lecture all present, including the preacher, on the errors of their ways and the problems with Puritan theology in general. This was called "going naked for a sign." 


In fact, the very term "Quaker" was a slur used because these religious fanatics would tend to became excited and "quake" when they preached or did things like this. And if the act of entering someone else's church, naked, and telling them they were not only praying wrong but their entire society was based on a misinterpretation of the Bible, sounds self destructive, it is important to understand that at this time the "Quakers" (members of what was later named the Religious Society of Friends) believed that the second coming was imminent, Jesus was going to return shortly, and we would all be judged and it was a good idea to get your own house and theological affairs in order shortly as the end was nigh. 

Now, for the record, to the best of my knowledge, Mary Dyer never did this (although it's safe to say I had other ancestors who surely must have done so) but this is how members of her sect were viewed by the people who hung her. 

So to some extent, the Quaker-Puritan rift grew out of a difference between authoritarian "top-down" Christian teachings and "bottom-up" each man or woman can find guide through their own efforts sort of Christianity as well as just a general fear of disruptive, anarchistic elements that would spread chaos and disorder. (all of which sound like things that, to me at least, the authorities in Boston sill oppose.) 

In 1661, Edward Burroughs wrote a book on the subject called "A Declaration of the Sad and Great Persecution and Martyrdom of the People of God, called Quakers, in New-England, for the Worshipping of God." It contains a detailed description of the hanging of Mary Dyer as well as the persecution of other Quakers in this place. The book begins by stating that it is "A DECLARATION Of some part of the S U F F E R I NG S of the People of God (in scorn called QUAKERS) from the Professors in NEW-ENGLAND, Only for the Exercise of their Consciences to the Lord, and Obeying and Confessing to the T RUTH , as in his Light he had discovered it to them." Note the use of the term "Professors" to describe the people who persecuted them, another sign of the "authoritarian-anti-authoritarian" aspect of the disagreements between the two groups. In this context, it's worth pointing out that Harvard, the oldest university in the USA, began as a theological institute to train Preachers in Puritan Massachusetts.  

Which brings us to poor Mary Dyer. Yes, she was hung, but not only had she been told by the authorities in Massachusetts to get out and stay out (Rhode Island being the normal destination for these sorts of troublemakers and intellectual non-conformists of all types and stripes of the time), but she had defied this order and returned, repeatedly. 

In their opinion, she, and people like her, had to be exiled as they did things like encourage people to have small, private Bible study groups where they read and discussed the Bible among each other instead of waiting for an educated, authority figure to explain it to them as was intended. Now, for the record, this was in 1637, a few years before Mary Dyer converted to Quakerism, but it was nevertheless a dangerous act to study the Bible on one's own and could easily lead to such problems as egalitarianism and anarchy. 

Not only did the authorities tell her to stop, but to show the other residents of Massachusetts how wrong and evil her actions were, 1n 1638, they dug up her still born infant (born and died on October 17, 1637) and told people what they had found. Governor Winthrop himself declared the baby to be: "it was of ordinary bigness; it had a face, but no head, and the ears stood upon the shoulders and were like an ape’s; it had no forehead, but over the eyes four horns, hard and sharp; two of them were above one inch long, the other two shorter; the eyes standing out, and the mouth also; the nose hooked upward; all over the breast and back full of sharp pricks and scales, like a thornback [i.e., a skate or ray], the navel and all the belly, with the distinction of the sex, were where the back should be, and the back and hips before, where the belly should have been; behind, between the shoulders, it had two mouths, and in each of them a piece of red flesh sticking out; it had arms and legs as other children; but, instead of toes, it had on each foot three claws, like a young fowl, with sharp talons.”

You think she'd get the message that she just wasn't wanted in Massachusetts. On the other hand, apparently, even though it was the governor who did it, taking a woman and telling people that her still-born child had been a demonic creature, no doubt do to his mother's heretical views, as demonstrated by trying to encourage independent Bible study groups, somehow failed to convince Mary Dyer that the authorities were terribly Christian and following the path of Christ. 

From this time onward, Mary Dyer sought religious truth and soon converted to being a Quaker. She then spent the next 23 years traveling New England, with a side trip to the old country of (old) England, meeting with Quakers, defying bans on the presence of Quakers, preaching publicly, even where it was forbidden, and was often arrested along the way. On June 1, 1660, the authorities in Boston became sick of her antics and hung her because she just wouldn't stop (which sounds like the way a lot of my Quaker relatives act when they think they are right, me too actually. Go ahead, hang us, we don't care. We're on a mission from God. No, really, we are. I felt it one day. Honest.)

But it's okay because they built a statue to her later.





For a good biography of Mary Dyer see:
http://www.quakersintheworld.org/quakers-in-action/15/Mary-Dyer

Edward Burrough in A Declaration of the Sad and Great Persecution and Martyrdom of the People of God, called Quakers, in New-England, for the Worshipping of God (1661)

https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1023&context=etas

Trump and Musk -What is motivating them? What is their end goal? Partial thoughts First

Trump and Musk -What is motivating them? What is their end goal? Partial thoughts First . . . what the heck is going on here? What are Donal...