Chop Sockey Kung Fu Miniature Wargame Rules test game --"We wuz just funnin' the China Man!" -After Action Report

Greetings. Hello there boys and girls. Well over a year or two ago, I began working on writing "Chop Sockey!!," a set of rules for kung fu comic or movie style wargames. The results are promising. A friend and I play tested them once, and then, like so many other things, along came the pandemic and that put an end to shared playtesting.


Alas! 

Having finished writing my book on Trump (yes, this is a plug, Feel free to buy it. Link below) and anxious to begin work on a new project, I pulled out the rules and gave them a test run playing solo. 

Basic scenario concept was to have a group of innocents being mistreated by bad people and some heroes need to come, intervene, and give them a chance to escape. 

Looking for suitable bad guys, I chose my recently painted "steam punky" Dead Rabbits gang. 

Now for the good guys, I realized that while I had suitable civilian figures, I had no rules for civilians, at least not yet.. (They shall be written soon and will be finished by next solo game.  I promise. The stats for civilians will give them very low, combat ability but high saves. This way, they don't really add much to combat but they do stay around long enough to be rescued.) 
For the good guys, I chose suitable Chinese Boxer rebellion or Taiping Uprising figures, creating a group of generic mobs of ten men with spears, swords, and muskets. I faced them off against each other at one corner of a four by four card table. I then put two suitable kung fu heroes at the farthest corner of the table. 
I called the scenario "We wuz just funnin' the Chinaman!" as an homeage to the classic 1970s TV show Kung Fu which chronicles the adventures of Kwai-Chiang Kane, a half breed Shaolin monk who wondered the old American west. An interesting show that shaped American images of kung fu and the martial arts in its early days, a common event in the series was that Kane would wonder into a western town. Soon after the local, inbred white trash with bad teeth would begin hassling him because he was Chinese and did not really fit in in that neighborhood, and go further and further with their hassling. Kane would inevitablly lecture them with Chinese philosophy (or the 1970s AmericanTV version of Chinese philosophy --think fortune cookie philosophy), that would fail, they would then attack him, and he would kick in half a dozen peoples teeth, leaving them on the ground whining "But we wuz just funnin' the Chinaman, and he done kicked our teeth all in!" 

Alas, good stuff. If you've never seen the show, your education is lacking something. 

Anyway, that's sort of what I was going for here. My results were mixed. 

Game Forces

The Dead Rabbits -a particular colorful group of White Trash and Irish Trash, no less

Unit One: Seven Dead Rabbits

            Classified as "Warriors" -each unit consists of a standard bearer with a Dead Rabbit on a pole and five men with clubs or swords and one with a firearm

Unit Two: Seven Dead Rabbits 

            Also classified as "Warriors" and equipped identically to the first unit although one was actually a woman and not a man -not that this makes any difference in these rules. It does, however, add color to the table top. 



Liam Angus McGutstab O'Heaney

            A widely feared drunken berserker. He was classified as a hero but given no chi points (He may conceivably have great chi. No one actually knows as he's simply too drunk and uncouth to know how to use it anyway if he does. I am, by the way, very proud of the figure. He's a conversion from, of all things, a Gaul gladiator, and I'm quite proud of him. See my old posts on the subject.) 

Ook Ook O'Brien

            A gorilla in a top hat. He escaped from the circus and was taken in by the Dead Rabbits. They were eager to have him, because they needed some better educated, more sophisticated, better travelled members and, being as he was widely travelled with the circus, he met the bill and filled the void.  

    Ook Ook is classified in the rules as a gorilla. Yes, there are rules for gorillas and other animals and I was hoping to try them out. Besides, it is a rule of thumb among wargamers, if you have a figure of gorilla in a top hat, put that figure in a game almost any chance you can. 


 The Good Hearted Chinese 

Three units of ten Chinese tong members classified as "fighters" armed with swords, spears and a few muskets. Each had a standard bearer. 

Two Kung Fu heroes at the far end of the table. These were unarmed but each had four points of "chi." 

Victory Conditions

The Chinese must escape off the far corner of the board with two thirds of their forces intact. 



Turn One


To determine which side went first a simple pair of dice were rolled for each side. The Dead Rabbits won. 

The turn sequence involves moving the units on a side, one by one, and then taking each unit through the entire turn sequence. 

Since the Dead Rabbits had four "units" -two seven man gangs, the gorilla, and the drunken berserker hero- this would mean four units would move through their sequence.

The first Dead Rabbit gang charged at the middle of the Chinese units. 
Being Warriors they had automatic activation and since they were charging they got double movement. Thus they moved ahead 8 inches, made contact with a group of Chinese seven or less inches away, and hand to hand fighting broke out.   




The attackers were classified as warriors and got 2 dice per figure or 14 dice total. 

The defenders were classified as fighters and got 1 dice each or 10 dice total. 

The dice were rolled and the Dead Rabbits inflicted 6 hits on the Chines tong members. The Chinese rolled their saving dice and only one of the six saved. Of the five hit, dice were rolled for the hit resul and three were wounded and two were dead. 

In that melee the Chinese caused three hits on the Dead Rabbits, killing two and wounding one. 


The second unit of Dead Rabbits charged the nearest unit of Chinese tong members and inflicted 7 hits. 


The hero and the gorilla were blocked from charging any of the other Chinese due to having the two melees taking place in front of them so they just advanced at normal speed and took up a position in support of the brawling gangs. 

Nevertheless, after the first turn, it was very obvious that the Chinese side was definitely way outclassed. Classifying all the forces on one side as "warriors," a designation intended for elite soldiers and their tribal or feudal equivalents, was a mistake. It had produced a very lop-sided battle. (Of course, I have thoughts on how to modify this in the future.) 

Chinese Phase of the First Turn


The Chinese side had five "units." These were the two heroes far to the rear and the three 10 man units of Tong fighters, two of which had taken heavy casualties already and were greatly weakened. 

Since the victory condition for the Chinese were to get as many figures to safety as possible, the untouched unit of Tong fighters decided to flee at double speed. In hindsight, I'm not sure this was a good idea, but, as they say, it seemed like a good idea at the time.

One of the heroes decided to charge into combat and to use lots of Chi to speed his entry. A normal charge or running move for a hero is 8 inches. For each point of Chi used, a hero can add 4 inches to his move. Using three points, he moved a total of 20 inches (8 + 12) and charged into combat with one of the Dead Rabbit gangs. He decided to go for broke and use his remaining chi point to add to his combat effectivness. 

Alas! Despite some heavy modifiers for that turn -the result of him using his chi- one hero versus seven warriors is a fight where the seven warriors have a strong advantage. A couple warriors left took hits and left the game but this meant that there were still five of them and one hero with no chi points, all alone against them and their nearby friends. 

The other hero saved his chi and moved 8 inches towards the center of the action. 

The remnants of the badly mauled units attempted to flee, but due to their wounds were not able. (If a character has a wound, he must consult a chart and pass a dice roll before perform actions such as fighting or moving. While a character can have multiple wounds, he must pass a dice roll for each and every wound or he cannot perform that action. The characters rolled badly and could not flee.)   



Turn Two -- Dead Rabbits Phase 


The two units of Dead Rabbits pursued or attacked the two units of Chinese tong members and the hero who supported them. They inflicted some more casualities but not enough to change the flow of the battle. 



The gorilla and the hero still found themselves waiting in support, watching, ready, but still not actually doing anything. 

Turn Two --Chinese Phase 

There were three units of tong fighters. 

One was undamaged but had chosen to flee. This was intended to increase the forces chances of meeting the victory conditions. In hindsight this might have been a bad idea, as the Dead Rabbits had already achieved their victory conditions, and it had become obvious that the scenario was probably quite unbalanced. 

The two Chinese heroes found themselves touching bases and formed a unit. This allowed them to activate and move together, as well as pool their dice in combat. 

Alas, when they entered combat, they found themselves outclassed by the large number of Dead Rabbits they were facing. Not only did they inflict little damage on the Dead Rabbits but one fo the heroes took hits and missed his saves and was killed and removed from the game. This left just one hero, one unwounded tong fighter, and several wounded tong fighters faced off against an overwhelming force of enemy warriors supported by a hero and a gorilla in a top hat.



Turn Three -FLEEEEE!!!

Seeing no other real option, the tong fighters fled the table. 

 

ANALYSIS

As a game, not terribly successful, but as a game testing or rule testing session a lot was learned about balancing scenarios. Several rules were tweaked afterwards. Others were added.  

And Please Consider Buying My Books. 
My Amazon Author Page

Thank you!

Mount Defiance and visiting American Revolutionary War sites in upstate New York



I spent Columbus Day weekend 2020 seeing American Revolutionary War related historical sites in the upstate NY Adirondack Mountains. Mount Defiance, the one shown here, was only one of them. For those interested in seeing such historical sites, ownership of such sites in the USA can be confusing and complex.

Fort Ticonderoga is owned by a private not-for-profit who also own Mount Defiance, the nearby hilltop from which Burgoyne menaced the fort in 1777.

Crown Point, well worth seeing, is about 25km north and owned and operated by the state of New York Parks department ( signage is bilingual French/ English due to proximity to Quebec. This is not common for NY government services)

Saratoga Battleground, about three hours to the south of Ticonderoga is part of the US National Park System and run by them. Johnson Hall, the home of Sir William Johnson, about an hour west of Saratoga is again a state run historic park but Fort Johnson, Johnson's earlier home about a half hour drive south of his later home, is owned and operated by the Montgomery County Historical Society. ( Technically not an American Revolutionary War site, of course, but well worth seeing if you visit his other home. )

Many close in the October or so for the winter and Covid-19 has complicated everything. Saratoga Park visitors center is closed but the grounds are open. Crown Point is closing early this season and closes this week, but when I arrived they had a policy of only one family at a time inside the museum at a time and I had to sit outside on a bench for 15 minutes waiting ( cool, museum though)


These are photos of Mount Defiance. In 1777, when Burgoyne's army headed south from Montreal in the campaign that culimnated in the Battle of Saratoga, one of the obstacles they faced was the American controlled Fort Ticonderoga. Burgoyne put the fort under siege and sought out good places to post cannons in order to menace the fort. One of these spots was nearby Mount Defiance. 

Today, Mount Defiance offers a beautiful view of the fort and Lake Champlain. It is private property, owned by the same not-for-profit foundation that owns Fort Ticonderoga. If one wishes to drive up to the observation spots, one needs to use a gated private road. Tickets are available for purchase at the fort. However, if one wishes and is in good health, you can easily park by the gate and walk up the raod to the picnic and viewing area, 

The view of the fort and the Lake Champlain from Fort Ticonderoga. 



A New York state historical marker  on the small town road
that leads to Mount Defiance and its private road. 




Another view of the fort from Mount Defiance.














At the top of Mount Defiance there is a flag pole and a fenced in area
that is part of the local power generation system.






























As one heads up to Mount Defiance you pass a civil war monument. 

Columbus as an Anti-racist symbol in American history, yes, you read that correctly -A couple great essays on Columbus Day

 History, like current events, tends to be complex. And when we write or speak about historical happenings, obviously, what gets discussed or reported is not necessarily what happened. Everyone knows that. 

But what's more important, is the way in which different aspects of history get looked at, emphasized, or de-emphasized. And different things become exposed or become clearer because they are looked at from different angles or perspectives. 

People tend to choose what they wish to remember, what they try to forget, and what the presumed lessons might be from real events that occurred in the past. And this changes over time.



When I was in graduate school studying Chinese history, my adviser, Sherman Cochran, simply loved a book called " Discovering History in China: American Historical Writing on the Recent Chinese Past," by Paul A. Cohen.  Every time he spoke of it, his eyes lit up. Basically it's a history of how Americans have approached the study of Chinese history and how that has changed over the decades. Very interesting. Well worth reading for the serious historian.

(You can learn more about the book here: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1952590.Discovering_History_in_China )

And nowhere at the moment, is this perhaps more true than with Columbus. He's shifted from hero to villain, when the truth was, obviously, much more complex. Of course, most people know that Columbus "discovered" America by accident while engaged on a ground-breaking, high-risk attempt to open a new trade route to India. Most of us also know that he never realized that he had found a pair of new continents and that when he did land, he not only treated the indigenous inhabitants very badly, he paved the way for years of exploitation and colonialism. Yet for decades he was and to many still is, remembered as a heroic figure. This needs to be put in context and not just swept aside as uninteresting and wrong headed. If I can cite Sherman Cochran, my above mentioned thesis advisor, an important part of studying and learning history is what motivated the people of a certain time and place to do and believe the things they did? And again, with Columbus, what not only motivates the people who are quick to cast him as a villain and destroy his statues, but what also motivated the people who worked hard to put those Columbus statues there in the first place? 

The answer, interestingly, is that both groups of people, the Columbus-statue-builders, and the Columbus-statue-destroyers, were motivated by anti-racism and the desire to make the United States a more equal and culturally embracing place to live. Yes, both sides.

Here are a couple essays that I found on the subject that I think are well worth reading. They both discuss Columbus and his fame and role as a hero in the context of Roman Catholic Italian-Americans seeking Italian-American heroes and symbols at a time when Protestant White Supremacist Nativist sentiment was an important part of the American societal landscape. In other words, they speak of the use of Columbus as a symbol and force against American racism.   

The first one is by Heather Cox Richardson, a historian and history professor at Boston College. She is responding to a recent 2020 White House Proclamation celebrating Columbus day. ( https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/proclamation-columbus-day-2020/?utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwAR0konL1VlriDq137qBSx70ko0JVWbTZev-2Gl50b1W9AicHtgpNjf06FZk ) Personally, I find her essay much more interesting and thoughtful than the White House Proclamation. 

Heather Cox's essay on Columbus from October 2020.

https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/october-12-2020?r=4msj0&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email&utm_source=copy&fbclid=IwAR2KFmRd8HvIyHfI0VJECUeCnZDtIjBhlkm31ovtnW1uekJerGX70EwK8iI


Jason Colavito is an author and popular historian who specializes in analyzing and explain the actual facts behind sensationalized claims of ancient and early history, particuarly those involving claims of "ancient aliens." Here he writes of Columbus, again, as a symbol for countering discrimiation against Itlaian Americans. 

http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/the-two-faces-of-columbus-how-a-genocidal-tyrant-became-an-anti-discrimination-icon-for-italian-americans

(As another aside, again when in graduate school studying Chinese history, my thesis advisor, Magnus Fiskesjo, recommended that I read a book called "Terra Cognita -The Mental Discovery of America," by Eviatar Zerubavel. If you have any interest in Columbus and the "discovery" of the New World by Europeans, I highly recommend this book. The author is an Israeli cartographer and his focusing is to find an answer to the question of "If Columbus did not know he had found new continents, when and how did Europeans realize they had found completely new continents? A so-called "New World"? In this book Zerubavel approaches the important question, seeking answers in maps by early explorers and others to see what they were representing of their discoveries and when and how they came to realize they had "discovered" something completely new. The answer, of course, is complex, and depicts an evolution of thought as more and more evidence is collected. Again, well worth reading. 

You can learn more about the book here: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/379776.Terra_Cognita


The Bonwit Teller Project and Trump’s Employment and Exploitation of Illegal Aliens

 

The Bonwit Teller Project 

and Trump’s  Employment  and Exploitation of 

Illegal Aliens



The Bonwit Teller Project
Prior to his demolishing of this building, Donald Trump promised to donate the 1929 art deco sculptures from the building to the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Instead they simply disappeared during demolition 

               

                The story of the Bonwit Teller Department Store and its demolishment and the rebuilding of Trump Towers on the site is a complex story. In 1978, Trump secured an option to buy on the decaying Bonwit Teller Department Store. [1]  He then needed to obtain control of the ground below the property which was owned by an insurance company and the air rights above, controlled by Tiffany Jewelers, located next door. However, now that he was a successful real estate magnate who had built the Grand Hyatt, it was easy enough to acquire a loan from the Chase Manhattan Bank that would enable him to purchase those.

                One of the next parts of the project was to demolish the old building so that it could be replaced. Demolishing a 12 story, downtown, decaying department store in Manhattan is no easy feat. Additionally, there was concern over what would happen to parts of the old building, specifically the large, bronze grillwork featuring art deco sculptures of 15 foot tall goddesses dating from 1930 that emblazoned the entrance to the store and building.[2]

                Many in the city, particularly in art circles, expressed concern for the fate of these sculptures and the grill work. If the building were demolished, what would happen to these pieces of architectural art? Complaints and concerns were voiced publicly. Trump responded by promising to save the pieces during the demolition and donate them to the Metropolitan Museum of Art, if removing them was not prohibitively expensive.

The 8th Floor Sculpture from the
Bonwit Teller Building. Now
long gone despite Trump's promises.

                As time went on, the project became notorious among Trump critics because of his use of illegal alien workers (what? Another instance of illegal immigrants in Trump’s life? How many are there?)  For part of the work, instead of hiring experienced demolition contractors, Trump contracted with a window washing company owned by a Polish émigré. The company provided over 200 workers, all or most of them undocumented workers from Poland. They often worked without hard hats or other safety gear. Some lived at the construction site and slept on the cold, concrete floor.  Their payment was irregular, and they were often cheated.  

                When workers complained, and allegedly threatened to throw Thomas Macari, Trump’s associate who closely watched over the project, with being dangled over the edge of the building, things changed but stayed messy. To this day shady accusations of several kinds follow the project, many documented. These include use of mob-connected union labor, using Trump and Roy Cohn’s personal connections to avoid inspection by the city and state agencies, threatening phone calls against workers and contractors from “John Barron,” Trump’s frequent alter-ego, and ultimately a lawsuit filed against Trump by the workers, a lawsuit that Trump and his lawyers delayed at every opportunity but nevertheless lost.  Ultimately, years later, a judge awarded the workers $325,000.

                Additionally, Trump failed to donate the sculptures and art deco front to the Metropolitan Museum of Art. They disappeared or were destroyed during the demolition.

The Bonwit Teller site later became the site for Trump Towers.[3]

                Ivanka helped. According to one source, Donald would occasionally encourage or allow her to go out and supervise the plumbers, electricians, carpenters, and steelworkers even though she knew nothing about these trades.  [4]

               

Finally, my books . . . 

Yeah, I've written books. Please check them out and see if they interest you.

(As if, being the author of these books does not already show bias, please be advised that if you purchase here, I receive a commission. The folks at Amazon wish to make it clear that this is an advertisement.) 


  



[1] An “option to buy” gives the purchaser the right to buy a piece of real estate at a fixed, specified price for a fixed specified period of time.
“What is an Option to Buy Contract and How it Protects You,” from Real Estate Sales Blog.
https://www.realestatesalesllc.com/real-estate/option-buy-contract-protects/

[2] “The Historic Building Donald Trump Demolished to Build Trump Tower,” by Sam Dangremond, August 18, 2017. https://www.townandcountrymag.com/leisure/arts-and-culture/a12030857/donald-trump-bonwit-teller/

 

[3]  Pages 69-76, Johnston, David Cay. “The Making of Donald Trump.” ( 2016. 2017. Melville House. Brooklyn.)

Pages 85-91, Kranish, Michael and Fisher, Marc “Trump revealed -The Definitive Biography of the 45th President.” ( 2016, Scribner, New York)

The amount of the settlement came from Johnston, page 74.

If you get a chance to watch the August 17, 2017 SNL Weekend Live segment where Tina Fey responds to Trump’s alleged desire to preserve historical monuments, particularly Confederate monuments, by shouting “Google Bonwit Teller!” you can now understand the reference better, if you didn’t catch it the first time.

 

"Blog housekeeping" and The Shaggs -- Perhaps one of the most notorious bands and albums ever made.



 


Greetings, welcome back. 

Here you will find an interesting moment in the history of rock and pop music, but first an update on the state of this blog and my so-called writing career, and then a bit on the nature of doing history in the year 2020. I recently finished a book, I think it's my sixth so far, and it's on Donald Trump. If you have not heard of him, Donald Trump was a man who was born into money and enjoyed appearing on television and in the press. He did some television and some cameos in movies. Sort of a "Hollywood Squares" kind of guy, but sort of, mostly after "Hollywood Squares" went off the air. (If you don't know what "Hollywood Squares" was google it or leave a comment below.) At one point in his career, in what may have been the world's biggest publicity stunt gone awry, he ran for president and much to the surprise of many, got himself elected. And the rest, as they say, is history. 

And, while in my opinion, he's doing a terrible job as President, he is doing a good job of manipulating a large segment of the population. And my book discusses how, exactly, he manipulates them. 



If you are interested, and even if you are not, aside from the many blog posts here, I have another blog that I do not use as much that discusses things other than history. You can find it here: http://peterhuston.blogspot.com/  It basically discusses things other than history. If you liked the recent Donald Trump posts, there are a few others over there too. And I have created a Goodreads author's page: https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/339311.Peter_Huston  The Amazon,com authors page is coming as soon as they and I straighten out some confusion over some paperwork issues. They tell me this should happen tomorrow. 

So that's it about me, at the moment. 

Second, my thoughts on the state of doing history in the year 2020. For the record, I believe that one of the reasons we now have such an unusual president (if nothing else, he is the first president we have had who has never served in the military or public office) is due to changes in society and the flow of information caused by the internet. And this changes history too. 

When doing history, arguably, the primary factors are the amount and type of sources. And the internet information explosion has often resulted in a huge deluge of sources available, literally, at the touch of a few fingers on the nearest linked in computer keyboard. Which changes the way we do history for many subjects. Often, instead of going to great trouble to obtain sources, any sources, one now finds oneself with an overwhelming number of sources and a need to sort them for research value. And one needs to sort them, and weigh and analyze them, often before determining how to use them. 

And sometimes one finds a subject that looks really cool, and you decide you want to dig into it, learn as much as you can, hoping to share it with others, only to discover that all the research has already been done before. 

And thus it is with the Shaggs  .  ,  , 

Such an interesting story, alas, it's all been told before. 


 So, here we have a primary source: 

You can listen to it, and if you hear just a little bit, you should be intrigued. If you hear the whole thing, well, congratulations to you. You've accomplished something many people find difficult. Either way, you will probably be wondering what it is and where it come from and how it came to be.



And if you are wondering where the above album came from, the answer is available in the video below. 

Of if you prefer you can go to the follow sources: 


Lester Bangs, the famous rock critic, wrote about them: http://www.keyofz.com/vvoice.htm 



Or you can watch this video: 




And that's kind of how research is done, at least on some projects, in the year 2020. 

To do it right, one should dig in, try to find more verification of fundamental facts. Perhaps something I will do later. 

Finally, my books . . . 

Yeah, I've written books. Please check them out and see if they interest you.


  

Not my book, but if you buy it here, you support this blog: 




Trump and Musk -What is motivating them? What is their end goal? Partial thoughts First

Trump and Musk -What is motivating them? What is their end goal? Partial thoughts First . . . what the heck is going on here? What are Donal...